|
|
SMS Server Tools 3 Community |
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. |
Wed May 08, 2024 23:30 |
This topic is locked
Page: 1
Author |
Post |
|
#1 Tue Sep 01, 2009 16:26, 178 months ago.
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Sweden
|
Hi all! I've been trying to setup an sms server for quite a while now without success My first guess was that I couldn't use a usb cable to connect my phone (nokia 35101) but after some configuring that part seems to be working. So, my second guess was that the baudrate could be the error, I've tried 9600, 19200 and a few more with no success. Now I have no idea of what to try. Here's my smsd log: On the line "2009-09-01 18:02:46,7, GSM1: ->" there is a strange symbol, a box with two zeros and a "1" and an "A" so I'm guessing the smsd has a problem interpreting the messages from the mobile, right? And my smsd conf: Thanks in advance! SHiR0
|
|
#2 Tue Sep 01, 2009 18:06, 178 months ago.
|
Administrator
Registered: May 2009
Location: Jyväskylä, Finland
|
shir0 wrote My first guess was that I couldn't use a usb cable to connect my phone (nokia 35101) but after some configuring that part seems to be working.
How did you verify that it's working completely? Using some terminal program like minicom? Did you get the OK response for AT command? Quote So, my second guess was that the baudrate could be the error, I've tried 9600, 19200 and a few more with no success.
You probably have tried 115200 and rtscts = yes, as those settings are the default values. If the device worked well while using other terminal program, what values was used with it? Quote On the line "2009-09-01 18:02:46,7, GSM1: ->" there is a strange symbol, a box with two zeros and a "1" and an "A" so I'm guessing the smsd has a problem interpreting the messages from the mobile, right?
It represents a sent data. When smsd tries to initialize the modem and there was no answer for the AT command, smsd tries to send a PDU termination character which is Ctrl-Z (1A in hex). This may help if a communication was broken and the modem is still waiting a PDU string. In your case it did not help. Some interface modules are known to be problematic when a communication starts. It may have something to do with FBUS/MBUS protocol. I do not know about this adapter cable for 3510i, but at least it does not look like the simplest one. In some cases, even up to 5 or 10 retries are needed until the communication starts to work. In your setup you use cs_convert = no setting. This has nothing to do with a communication problem, but have you noticed that with this setting you should create message files using GSM character set or Unicode? If you are sending messages with 160 characters / part and creating a file using ISO or UTF-8, cs_convert will convert the alphabet to GSM which is the most usual way.
|
|
#3 Tue Sep 01, 2009 19:01, 178 months ago.
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Sweden
Topic owner
|
Quote How did you verify that it's working completely? Using some terminal program like minicom? Did you get the OK response for AT command?
I thought that the line in smsd.log with the hex character was a reply from the phone (though not interpreted correctly). But now that you told me it was a "ctrl-z" sent from smsd I guess it isn't working after all. Another thing that i thought was a good indication was that with rtscts = yes I got: And with rtscts = no I got: And therefore I assumed that the connection was working. But all my assumptions seems to be based on a misunderstanding since i thought the "GSM1: -> AT" parts were replies from the phone. I just read about wvdialconf briefly and when I ran it I got According to dmesg the phone is suppose to be connected on ttyUSB0. From the looks of it I guess its the cable right? Maby the serial cable might do the trick? « Last edit by shir0 on Tue Sep 01, 2009 19:04, 178 months ago. »
|
|
#4 Wed Sep 02, 2009 16:35, 178 months ago.
|
Administrator
Registered: May 2009
Location: Jyväskylä, Finland
|
shir0 wrote According to dmesg the phone is suppose to be connected on ttyUSB0. From the looks of it I guess its the cable right? Maby the serial cable might do the trick?
Yes, the port looks correct. Probably the cable is broken, or it needs some special driver. Can you test this cable on Windows?
|
|
#5 Thu Sep 03, 2009 18:24, 178 months ago.
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Sweden
Topic owner
|
Quote Yes, the port looks correct.
Probably the cable is broken, or it needs some special driver. Can you test this cable on Windows?
Now that you mention it, there was a drivers cd included. I've got windows on my lappy, perhaps I'll try it tomorrow. I doubt the cable's broken since its brand new, on the other hand, it did require some force to connect it to the phone. Probably the worst connector I've ever seen
|
This topic is locked
Page: 1
Time in this board is UTC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|